Arizona Republic on MSN: Maricopa County Fair to forgo petting zoo after E. coli outbreak
The sense of ' petting ' meaning "to stroke" is first found 1818. Slang sense of "kiss and caress" is from 1920 (implied in petting, in F. Scott Fitzgerald). The common-sense trajectory seems to be the use of …
What you are describing is "petting." Although, petting is usually done to animals. It may be insulting in some cultures to do it to people. Some asian cultures might find it disrespectful as this …
I had always assumed that "back biting" referred to when, say, a dog who was being petted twisted around and bit the hand doing the petting.
It took me a while to realise that in that context, blow-jobs are usually seen as "normal, heavy petting", whereas penetrative sex is usually classed as "whoring" regardless of whether …
Not ‘I want to pet a dog’ (‘wanting’ is not ‘having’) but ‘wow! I looove this feeling of petting a dog! It is the feeeeling that makes it happen. You must feel it. Emotionallly. Because feeling is the …
COCA has several examples of "a stables": e.g.: "Their dates were simple: walks in the park, petting horses at a stables near her Silver Spring apartment, takeout Thai dinners and …
etymology - How did the words "petting" and "necking" come to mean ...
The sense of ' petting ' meaning "to stroke" is first found 1818. Slang sense of "kiss and caress" is from 1920 (implied in petting, in F. Scott Fitzgerald). The common-sense trajectory seems to be the use of the word in relation to domestic animals, then children, then adults affectionately, then romantically. See 'petting parties' here.
What you are describing is "petting." Although, petting is usually done to animals. It may be insulting in some cultures to do it to people. Some asian cultures might find it disrespectful as this article explains. According to Merriam-Webster, definition 1 (b) of the verb "pet" is "to stroke in a gentle or loving manner."
The word "pet" has a few different definitions (my own paraphrase): n: An animal kept for companionship. v: To affectionately caress. My question is, which of these usages originated first? Do we refer to companion animals as "pets" because we pet them? Or is the act of "petting" so dubbed because it is what we do to pets?
Not ‘I want to pet a dog’ (‘wanting’ is not ‘having’) but ‘wow! I looove this feeling of petting a dog! It is the feeeeling that makes it happen. You must feel it. Emotionallly. Because feeling is the language that the Universe understands. Example. I awoke one morning, thought with enthusiasm ‘it would be great to have a pink ...
It took me a while to realise that in that context, blow-jobs are usually seen as "normal, heavy petting", whereas penetrative sex is usually classed as "whoring" regardless of whether anyone actually paid for it.
COCA has several examples of "a stables": e.g.: "Their dates were simple: walks in the park, petting horses at a stables near her Silver Spring apartment, takeout Thai dinners and occasional splurges on extravagant chocolate desserts at the Willard Hotel". While Merriam Webster only lists the noun stable, it has examples which use singular stables, for example: "For drinks, simply wander back ...
How would you explain JavaScript closures to someone with a knowledge of the concepts they consist of (for example functions, variables and the like), but does not understand closures themselves? ...
I asked a question about currying and closures were mentioned. What is a closure? How does it relate to currying?
I frequently choose to use closures in the Strategy Pattern when the strategy is modified by data at run-time. In a language that allows anonymous block definition -- e.g., Ruby, C# -- closures can be used to implement (what amount to) novel new control structures. The lack of anonymous blocks is among the limitations of closures in Python.
But the callback function in the setTimeout is also a closure; it might be considered "a practical use" since you could access some other local variables from the callback. When I was learning about closures, realising this was useful to me - that closures are everywhere, not just in arcade JavaScript patterns.
3 Closures fit pretty well into an OO world. As an example, consider C# 3.0: It has closures and many other functional aspects, but is still a very object-oriented language. In my experience, the functional aspects of C# tend to stay within the implementation of class members, and not so much as part of the public API my objects end up exposing.
Lambdas and closures are each a subset of all functions, but there is only an intersection between lambdas and closures, where the non-intersecting part of closures would be named functions that are closures and non-intersecting lamdas are self-contained functions with fully-bound variables.
What do the closures capture exactly? Closures in Python use lexical scoping: they remember the name and scope of the closed-over variable where it is created. However, they are still late binding: the name is looked up when the code in the closure is used, not when the closure is created. Since all the functions in your example are created in the same scope and use the same variable name ...
With closures the vars referenced are maintained even after the outer function is done or 'closed' if that helps you remember the point. Even with closures, the life cycle of local vars in a function with no inner funcs that reference its locals works the same as it would in a closure-less version.
I was listening to Crockford's talk on JavaScript closures and am convinced of the benefit of information hiding, but I do not have a firm understanding of when to use callback functions. It is mo...
Students sometimes distinguish between "light petting" and "heavy petting," meaning, by the former term, the milder and more restricted forms of endearment, and by the latter the more intimate, unrestricted and agitating kinds of physical-emotional relations.