In your exact context, the real underlying implication is probably more don't go too fast for your dating partner rather than ...for yourself, but that's just a quirk of the exact context. Normally, getting ahead of yourself doesn't imply being precipitate / over-hasty from the perspective of others.
So, I like getting/ to get to the station in plenty of time. In grammar in use book, the bold part has been considered as correct answer. I am wondering why. What is more, would you show me a more detailed explanation or another synonym for the following?-- I have some problem with especially using the preposition in along with plenty of time.
- Getting messed up = refers to becoming whatever the condition is (in a bad situation) to get messed up or getting messed up=slang that means to be drunk, drugged or having some sort of problem about something. Getting messed up is something I try to avoid. [getting messed up=subject of the sentence. See being messed up below for more grammar.] Here, the verb get means become. Become is ...
Yes there is a difference. Trees are getting cut down refers to an action that is in progress. Someone is cutting the trees. It is the form encountered more frequently. Trees getting cut down can be used in the context of an intended action. To explain: If someone has decided to cut some trees down, they may be referred to as the trees getting ...
When I go to an airport, the airport announcement announces 'boarding a plane' than 'getting on a plane'. Because they say in public places all the time, I start to feel 'boarding' is a more formal word than 'getting on'.
“Her Rights, Our Future, Right Now” is the theme chosen by UN Human Rights to celebrate International Women’s Day 2025. Progress on women’s rights and gender equality, driven by powerful feminist movements and women’s rights activists across the globe, have profoundly transformed our societies, making them fairer, more resilient and peaceful. Gender equality lies at the core of all ...
Moreover, many women, including transgender, gender diverse and intersex women, face compounded forms of discrimination—due to factors such as their age, race, ethnicity, disability, or socio-economic status—in addition to gender-based discrimination.
What did Alan Walker say about "Faded"? I created the original, instrumental version of this song, which was called “Fade,” more than two years ago. It was my first release, and quickly became...
more retail is a pioneer in food and grocery retail in India, with a national footprint. We are an Omni Channel Retailer catering to all shopping occasions of our customers through Supermarkets, Hypermarts and e-grocery, powered by Amazon.
The modifies the adverb more and they together form an adverbial modifier that modifies the verb doubt. According to Wiktionary, the etymology is as follows: From Middle English, from Old English þȳ (“by that, after that, whereby”), originally the instrumental case of the demonstratives sē (masculine) and þæt (neuter).
Sure enough, this ngram shows that stupider got started long after more stupid. Apparently, the need to compare levels of stupidity was so great that people granted stupid a sort of honorary Anglo-Saxon status in order to use the more-convenient comparative -er. And once stupider is in, by analogy vapider eventually starts sounding more acceptable.
Just FYI, though, "more better" is pretty frequently used ironically these days by the hipsters and the whatnot to simply mean "better". Also, while I think no one would responsibly advocate this use, I think you could make an argument for saying "peaches are more better than apricots than plums are better than pluots".
The more, the more You can see all of this in a dictionary example: the more (one thing happens), the more (another thing happens) An increase in one thing (an action, occurrence, etc.) causes or correlates to an increase in another thing. [1] The more work you do now, the more free time you'll [you will] have this weekend.
adjectives - The more + the + comparative degree - English Language ...
The stories may be make-believe, but ALSO much more than make-believe (that in the sentence): It will among other teach them the morals of the Agta, the myths and how they see the world around them. Possibly even prepare them for other skills - how to spot certain foods, teach them more words in their language etc.
"more than that" in the context - English Language Learners Stack Exchange
When "more" is used before adjective or adverb as "inconvenient" in your example, it is an adverb whose primary function is to modify the following word. However, when it is used before a noun (or sometimes after a noun), it is used as a determiner or adjective. For example: I need more money. More context is required. I need something more (to eat). In the above examples, it means: greater in ...
To use the correct adjective with the phrase "in detail", think about fewer vs less in number vs amount - but remember "in detail" means specifically or completely already. Examples: I have read your question and answered it "in detail". If you want to read my explanations "in more detail", keep reading. You might find another answer that explains it just as well with fewer details (which ...
phrase usage - "in more details" or "in detail" - English Language ...
The harder I study, the better score I can get in IELTS exam. The larger the number of people interested in art, the happier the society is. The more fitness centres is available, the healthier the people is. The smaller the\no article farmland is, the less food is produced. I will appreciate giving me more examples.
grammar - "the more ....., the more..." examples - English Language ...
Under which circumstances would you use "much more" instead of "many more" ? For example would this be correct: I have much more money. Thanks in advance!
grammar - When to use "much more" or "many more"? - English Language ...
"More likely than not" logically means with a probability greater than 50%. A probability of 50% would be "as likely as not". But the user of the phrase is not making a mathematically precise estimate of probability. They are expressing what they think is likely in an intentionally vague way, and it's misplaced precision to try to assign a number to it. As an opposite, one could simply say ...